English

A Berry Esseen Theorem for the Lightbulb Process

Probability 2011-02-22 v3 Statistics Theory Statistics Theory

Abstract

In the so called lightbulb process, on days r=1,...,nr=1,..., n, out of nn lightbulbs, all initially off, exactly rr bulbs, selected uniformly and independent of the past, have their status changed from off to on, or vice versa. With XX the number of bulbs on at the terminal time nn, an even integer, and μ=n/2,σ2=Var(X)\mu=n/2, \sigma^2=Var(X), we have supzRP(Xμσz)P(Zz)n2σ2Δˉ0+1.64nσ3+2σ \sup_{z \in \mathbb{R}} |P(\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma} \le z)-P(Z \le z)| \le \frac{n}{2\sigma^2} \bar{\Delta}_0 + 1.64 \frac{n}{\sigma^3}+ \frac{2}{\sigma} where ZZ is a standard normal random variable, and \bar{\Delta}_0 = 1/2\sqrt{n}} + \frac{1}{2n} + 1/3 e^{-n/2} \qmq {for $n \ge 6$,} yielding a bound of order O(n1/2)O(n^{-1/2}) as nn \to \infty. A similar, though slightly larger bound holds for nn odd. The results are shown using a version of Stein's method for bounded, monotone size bias couplings. The argument for even nn depends on the construction of a variable XsX^s on the same space as XX that has the XX-size bias distribution, that is, that satisfies \beas E [X g(X)] =\mu E[g(X^s)] \quad for all bounded continuous gg, \enas and for which there exists a B0B \ge 0, in this case B=2, such that XXsX+BX \le X^s \le X+B almost surely. The argument for nn odd is similar to that for nn even, but one first couples XX closely to VV, a symmetrized version of XX, for which a size bias coupling of VV to VsV^s can proceed as in the even case. In both the even and odd cases, the crucial calculation of the variance of a conditional expectation requires detailed information on the spectral decomposition of the lightbulb chain.

Cite

@article{arxiv.1001.0612,
  title  = {A Berry Esseen Theorem for the Lightbulb Process},
  author = {Larry Goldstein and Haimeng Zhang},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1001.0612},
  year   = {2011}
}

Comments

38 pages - Version 3 provides a much shorter and completely transparent proof of Lemma 3.2. An error in the odd case coupling has been corrected, resulting in a somewhat larger constant, and a simpler overall expression for the bound. The constant for the even case has been slightly improved

R2 v1 2026-06-21T14:30:54.883Z