English

$^{15}$C inelastic $1/2^+ \rightarrow 5/2^+$ excitation: A single-particle versus a collective process

Nuclear Theory 2026-07-25 v1

Abstract

Background: The excitation of one-neutron halo nucleus 15^{15}C from the 1/2+1/2^+ ground state to the 5/2+5/2^+ first excited state was measured at Argonne National Laboratory by impinging 15^{15}C on a deuterated target at 7.1A7.1 A MeV. This data was then analyzed in the Distorted Wave Born Approximation using a rigid rotor model for the excitation. Purpose: Being a one-neutron halo, we expect a single-particle excitation to better represent the excitation of 15^{15}C rather than a collective process. We expect the breakup of 15^{15}C to influence the reaction mechanisms because of the low one-neutron separation threshold, which is close in energy to 15^{15}C's first excited state. The goal of this work is to explore various the reaction mechanisms to reinterpret the data of Ref.[1] for the inelastic excitation of 15^{15}C. Method: We solve the scattering problem assuming a three-body model 14^{14}C+n+d+n+d. We use the Continuum Discretized Coupled Channel method (CDCC) and compare the results with those obtained assuming 1-step DWBA with quadrupole deformation, as done in the original experimental analysis. We also use Bayesian uncertainty quantification to estimate the uncertainties in our predictions coming from the nn-dd interaction. Results: We analyze both the elastic and inelastic angular distributions for 15^{15}C(d,d')15C^{15}\text{C}^* at 7.1A7.1 A MeV. Our results show that 15^{15}C breakup effects are important. Conclusions: While CDCC predicts the elastic angular distribution correctly, it is not able to fully describe the experimental inelastic angular distribution. We discuss additional effects that may be responsible for the remaining discrepancy.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2607.23291,
  title  = {$^{15}$C inelastic $1/2^+ \rightarrow 5/2^+$ excitation: A single-particle versus a collective process},
  author = {C. Beckman and M. Catacora-Rios and C. Hebborn and F. M. Nunes},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.23291},
  year   = {2026}
}